Logo

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

Last Updated: 20.06.2025 09:50

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

PC: Google…my precious!

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

Actually have some literary skill:

What do you think of Vance using a clip of an embarrassed teenager from almost 20 years ago in an attempt to bully Kamala Harris?

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

Many if not most, are in this category.

PC: Google

What disgusts you?

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

PC: The Guardian

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.

The doctor said 'be happy.' Music therapy can help cancer patients do that - NPR

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.

Why is social media so anti-fee speech, and have they become total BS?

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

Have you ever been forced to dress like a girl?

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

Entertainment.

It is day 42 of the Trump administration. Is the war in Ukraine over? Is inflation solved? Are groceries cheaper?

There are some books that just…suck!

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).

The Democrats’ candidate, Kamala, is a total loser, while our candidate, Trump, is a legendary hero and a living god. Are you ready to lose BIG Democrats?

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

Because reading is WORK. Period.

Netflix and chill is a thing:

What movies have not aged well?

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

Go inside the development of NASA's $10 billion James Webb Space Telescope with new 'Cosmic Dawn' documentary - Space

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

PC: Google

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to:

What is something you have to share?

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.

PC: Google

Have the ability to visualize:

Why do heterosexual men like anal sex with women? I think it's because they secretly want to have anal sex with a man? What do you think?

PC: Google

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

Are fanservice-y characters (i.e. Lara Croft, Tifa Lockhart) immediately bad?

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

What do you think of Hegseth calling The Atlantic journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, "a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who has made a profession of peddling hoaxes” after team Trump texted him their top-secret war plans on Yemen?

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema:

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

Why do flat earthers think using globetrotter, globetard, and other insults will make the educated arguer fall for the silly flat-earth belief?

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

Has anyone ever worn leather pants? Are they comfortable?

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly:

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.